Skip to main content
· 9/30/1998

City of Annapolis v. Rowe

Citations

  • 717 A.2d 976
  • 123 Md. App. 267
  • 14 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 716
  • 1998 Md. App. LEXIS 168

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that suspended employee had no constitutionally protected property interest in actually performing job; due process rights are not implicated so long as employee continues to receive salary and benefits
  • stating that Article 24 “ ‘protects due process rights and is construed in pan materia with the federal Due Process Clause’ ” (citation omitted)
  • firefighter who was suspended with pay had no constitutionally protected property interest in actually performing his job, was not deprived of due process, and was not entitled to presuspension hearing
  • students suspended for 10 days without a hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Salmon, Eyler, Bell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.