· 9/30/1998
City of Annapolis v. Rowe
Citations
- 717 A.2d 976
- 123 Md. App. 267
- 14 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 716
- 1998 Md. App. LEXIS 168
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that suspended employee had no constitutionally protected property interest in actually performing job; due process rights are not implicated so long as employee continues to receive salary and benefits
- stating that Article 24 “ ‘protects due process rights and is construed in pan materia with the federal Due Process Clause’ ” (citation omitted)
- firefighter who was suspended with pay had no constitutionally protected property interest in actually performing his job, was not deprived of due process, and was not entitled to presuspension hearing
- students suspended for 10 days without a hearing
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Salmon, Eyler, Bell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.