City of Amarillo v. Hancock

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, for plaintiff to bring himself within protection of due process claims, right adversely affected by action of administrative body must be vested property right
• holding that, for plaintiff to bring himself within protection of due process claims, right adversely affected by action of administrative body must be vested property right
• holding that, for plaintiff to bring himself within protection of due process claims, right adversely affected by action of administrative body must be vested property right
• holding that, under the provisions of the civil service act in question, an individual has no vested property right in his position of captain of the fire department because the City could abolish particular captain positions or the rank of captain entirely
• holding that, under the provisions of the civil service act in question, an individual has no vested property right in his position of captain of the fire department because the City could abolish particular captain positions or the rank of captain entirely
• indicating that, for plaintiff to bring self within protection of due process clause, right adversely affected by action of administrative body must be vested property right

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).