· 12/7/1989
City Fire Equipment Co. v. Ansul Fire Protection Wormald U.S., Inc.
Citations
- 125 B.R. 645
- 1989 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 17374
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a bankruptcy court has jurisdiction to hear and determine all matters in a fraudulent conveyance case, up to the point of conducting a jury trial, which would have to be done in District Court
- no reason to disallow bankruptcy judges from ruling on dispositive motions in non-core proceedings
- “While motions to dismiss and motions for summary judgment may be dispositive, they do not impact on the right to a jury trial. They merely involve legal issues as to whether any trial is necessary.... The granting of such motions does not deprive a party of a right to a jury trial”
- “While motions to dismiss and motions for summary judgment may be dispositive, they do not impact on the right to a jury trial. They merely involve legal issues as to whether any trial is necessary.... The granting of such motions does not deprive a party of a right to a jury trial.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Acker, Allgood, Clarence, Clemon, Foy, Guin, Haltom, Lynne, Pointer, Propst, Robert, Sam, Seybourn, William
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.