Skip to main content
· 12/8/2005

City and County of Honolulu v. Hsiung

Citations

  • 124 P.3d 434
  • 109 Haw. 159
  • 2005 Haw. LEXIS 609

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that this court has held that “our rules of statutory construction requires us to reject an interpretation of a statute or an ordinance that renders any part of the statutory language a nullity” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
  • noting that this court has held that \our rules of statutory construction requires us to reject an interpretation of a statute or an ordinance that renders any part of the statutory language a nullity\ (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
  • rejecting statutory interpretations that “render[] any part of the statutory language a nullity”
  • \[O]ur rules of statutory construction requires us to reject an interpretation of a statute . . . that renders any part of the statutory language a nullity\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moon, Levinson, Acoba, Duffy, Perkins, Nakayama

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.