City and Borough of Juneau v. Quinto

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a driver had no reasonable expectation of privacy during a traffic stop when the officer was “in full uniform” and “it should have been clear . . . that [the officer] was performing his official duties”
• concluding that a driver had no reasonable expectation of privacy during a traffic stop when the officer was “in full uniform” and “it should have been clear . . . that [the officer] was performing his official duties”
• warrant requirement applied to electronic monitoring of a police informant’s conversations with a suspect
• tape recording of defendant's conversation with police officer was properly admitted into evidence at trial, when defendant knew, or reasonably should have known, that he was speaking to police officer
• tape recording of defendant’s conversation with police officer was properly admitted into evidence at trial, when defendant knew, or reasonably should have known, that he was speaking to police officer
• warrantless recording between defendant and informer inadmissible because it violated Alaska Constitution

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).