CITRUS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, INC. D/B/A CITRUS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL v. MARLA IANNELLI AND TONY GAINEY

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the step two inquiry is a de minimis screening device to 27 dispose of groundless claims
• stating that the step two inquiry is a de minimis screening device to 27 dispose of groundless claims
• refusing to consider petitioner’s challenge to the Board’s second-election order even though the Board’s unfair labor practice determinations were “utterly without merit”
• expressing concern about a Board decision indicating that “it is perfectly acceptable to use the most offensive and derogatory racial or sexual epithets, so long as those using such language are engaged in union organizing or efforts to vindicate protected labor activity”
• expressing concern about a Board decision indicating that “it is perfectly acceptable to use the most offensive and derogatory racial or sexual epithets, so long as those using such language are engaged in union organizing or efforts to vindicate protected labor activity”
• “Plaintiffs’ complaint was required to allege specific facts that show” 20 how statements were false

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).