Citrosuco Paulista, S.A. v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Commission may not weigh causes, and an affirmative injury determination is warranted if LTFV imports contribute even minimally
• holding that the Commission may not weigh causes, and an affirmative injury determination is warranted if imports contribute even minimally
• upholding definition of like product and finding earlier determinations not binding for purposes of definition, in part because parties did not argue issue previously
• noting the general rule that an agency must either conform itself to prior decisions or explain its departure
• denying intervention to marketing association which was party to administrative proceedings but was not interested party because members did not produce a “like product”
• upholding Commission finding that increased production capacity, and low utilization levels, would result in increased exports to the United States when, among other things, the United States is a major market for exporting companies

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).