Citro v. Zeek

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• failing to provide a prisoner with an adequate supply of toilet paper does not create a violation of constitutional magnitude
• Failure to provide an inmate adequate supply of toilet paper did not present a question of constitutional magnitude
• Failure to provide inmate with adequate supply of toilet paper did not present a question of constitutional magnitude

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Spencer Harris v. Ronald Fleming, Larry Frailey and Walter Breischke
  Seventh Circuit· 1988-02-12· cited 411×
• Gilson v. Cox
  E.D. Michigan· 1989-05-02· cited 6×
• Caudle-El v. Peters
  N.D. Illinois· 1989-10-15· cited 4×
• Stewart v. City of Wichita, Kan.
  D. Kansas· 1993-07-15· cited 2×
• Thomas v. Smith
  W.D. New York· 1983-02-03· cited 1×
• Nelson v. Herdzik
  W.D. New York· 1983-02-09

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Josephina Duchesne as Administratrix of the Estate of Pauline Perez v. Jule M. Sugarman
  Second Circuit· 1977-11-08· cited 380×
• James G. Ellingburg v. A. G. Lucas, Correctional Employee, Cummins Unit, Arkansas Department of Correction
  Eighth Circuit· 1975-06-25· cited 92×
• Chester L. Oughton v. United States of America (John C. Taylor, Warden)
  Tenth Circuit· 1962-11-01· cited 54×
• Frison v. District of Columbia Department of Corrections
  Supreme Court· 1963-05-27· cited 46×
• Clark James Redford v. Samuel W. Smith
  Tenth Circuit· 1976-09-09· cited 30×
• Pollard v. Baskerville
  E.D. Virginia· 1979-12-14· cited 16×
• Tunnell v. Robinson
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 1980-03-20· cited 14×
• Griffin v. Smith
  W.D. New York· 1980-07-10· cited 13×