Citizens Protecting Michigan's Constitution v. Secretary of State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[a] claim is not ripe if it rests upon contingent future events that may not occur as anticipated, or may not occur at all”
• noting that a claim is not ripe “if it rests upon contingent future events that may not occur as anticipated, or may not occur at all”
• rejecting a ripeness challenge that was premised on the fact that the Board had not decided whether to certify an initiative petition
• tracing California law and adopting it as consistent with our law
• the party seeking a writ of mandamus must establish that it (1) has a clear legal right to performance of the specific duty sought, (2) the defendant has the clear legal duty to perform the act requested, (3) the act is ministerial, and (4
• permitting a ballot question committee to challenge a petition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).