Citizens Nat. Bk., Grant Cty. v. 1ST NAT. BK., MARION

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that following remand, the state court appropriately ruled on a motion to dismiss filed in federal court and therefore defendants were not in default
• assuming that two year statute of limitations applied to Indiana state antitrust claim
• following remand state court properly ruled on motion to dismiss filed in federal court
• pleadings filed in federal court have effect in state court upon remand
• federal court, having assumed jurisdiction upon defendants' petition for removal, remanded the cause to state court without ruling on motions to dismiss
• federal court, having assumed jurisdiction upon defendants' petition for removal, remanded the cause to state court without ruling on motions to dismiss

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).