· 8/2/2013
Citizens Health Corporation v. Kathleen Sebelius
Citations
- 725 F.3d 687
- 2013 WL 3957578
- 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 16048
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “[t]he threshold question in any due process challenge is whether a protected property or liberty interest actually exists”
- holding district court did not err in granting summary judgment by “overlooking disputed issues of 18 material fact” where “plain text” of document “tnambiguously” mandated outcome
- “[T]he threshold question in any due process challenge is whether a protected property or liberty interest actually exists.”
- “[T]he threshold question in any due process challenge is whether a protected property or liberty interest actually exists.”’
- “the threshold question in any due process challenge is whether a protected property or liberty interest actually exists.”
- “The threshold question in any due process challenge is whether a protected property or liberty interest actually exists.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Easterbrook, Williams, Hamilton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.