Skip to main content
· 8/2/2013

Citizens Health Corporation v. Kathleen Sebelius

Citations

  • 725 F.3d 687
  • 2013 WL 3957578
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 16048

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “[t]he threshold question in any due process challenge is whether a protected property or liberty interest actually exists”
  • holding district court did not err in granting summary judgment by “overlooking disputed issues of 18 material fact” where “plain text” of document “tnambiguously” mandated outcome
  • “[T]he threshold question in any due process challenge is whether a protected property or liberty interest actually exists.”
  • “[T]he threshold question in any due process challenge is whether a protected property or liberty interest actually exists.”’
  • “the threshold question in any due process challenge is whether a protected property or liberty interest actually exists.”
  • “The threshold question in any due process challenge is whether a protected property or liberty interest actually exists.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Williams, Hamilton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.