Skip to main content
· 9/1/2004

Citizens for Responsible Choices v. City of Shenandoah

Citations

  • 686 N.W.2d 470
  • 2004 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 236
  • 2004 WL 1935395

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing a motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction can consider concessions made in response to the motion
  • finding , for purposes of a declaratory judgment there was no justiciable controversy prior to a final decision of other governing bodies involved in the case
  • “Whether litigants have standing does not depend on the legal merit of their claims, but rather whether, if the wrong alleged produces a legally cognizable injury, they are among those who have sustained it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.