Citizens for Responsible Behavior v. Superior Court

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “Hunter was a ‘strict scrutiny’ case in which the law invalidly classified the affected parties on the basis of traditionally suspect characteristics”
• anti-gay initiative requiring a majority vote to enact any prohibition on sexual orientation discrimination lacked rational basis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).