Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics v. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “courts consistently require substantiation” of arguments that information is already publicly available
• finding that a request for contracts and records of contacts between HHS and media firms, which concerned routine administrative activities at a federal agency, related to government operations and activities

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).