· 4/2/2013
Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics v. Federal Election Commission
Citations
- 404 U.S. App. D.C. 275
- 711 F.3d 180
- 2013 WL 1296289
- 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 6540
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that for documents to be “promptly” produced under FOIA, they must typically be produced “within days or a few weeks” of a determination, not “months or years”
- holding that administrative exhaustion did not apply because the agency did not make a determination within 20 days and did not notify Plaintiff of his appeal rights until 75 days after the FOIA request was made
- holding that administrative exhaustion did not apply because the agency did not make a determination within 20 days and did not notify Plaintiff of his appeal rights until 75 days after the FOIA request was made
- stating that more than “an initial statement that the agency will generally comply with a FOIA request and will produce non-exempt documents and claim exemptions in the future” is required
- explaining that review of a district court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo
- holding the only remedy for an agency’s 17 delayed processing of a FOIA request is the ability to file suit without first exhausting 18 administrative remedies
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Griffith, Kavanaugh, Sentelle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.