Skip to main content
· 4/2/2013

Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics v. Federal Election Commission

Citations

  • 404 U.S. App. D.C. 275
  • 711 F.3d 180
  • 2013 WL 1296289
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 6540

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that for documents to be “promptly” produced under FOIA, they must typically be produced “within days or a few weeks” of a determination, not “months or years”
  • holding that administrative exhaustion did not apply because the agency did not make a determination within 20 days and did not notify Plaintiff of his appeal rights until 75 days after the FOIA request was made
  • holding that administrative exhaustion did not apply because the agency did not make a determination within 20 days and did not notify Plaintiff of his appeal rights until 75 days after the FOIA request was made
  • stating that more than “an initial statement that the agency will generally comply with a FOIA request and will produce non-exempt documents and claim exemptions in the future” is required
  • explaining that review of a district court’s grant of summary judgment is de novo
  • holding the only remedy for an agency’s 17 delayed processing of a FOIA request is the ability to file suit without first exhausting 18 administrative remedies

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Griffith, Kavanaugh, Sentelle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.