Citizens for Resp. Growth v. St. Pete Beach

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that when interpreting a statute, the \`express mention of one thing is the exclusion of another'\ (quoting Inman v. State, 916 So.2d 59, 61 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005))
• stating that courts must, “if possible, interpret the amendment as constitutional”
• applying a general principle of statutory construction, expressio unius est exclusio alteráis, meaning that the “express mention of one thing is the exclusion of another”
• “Rather than conflicting with the statutory framework, the proposed City charter amendments complement it....”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).