Citizens for Preservation of Waterman Lake v. Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the defendant was not liable when “there [was] virtually no evidence establishing that such odors were caused by any actions on the part of [the] defendant”
• declining to impose liability for public nuisance when plaintiff “failed to produce any evidence directly bearing on the amount of noise created by trucks under [defendant’s] control ”
• rejecting claim where plaintiff acquiesced to judgment in favor of one of two alleged conspirators
• “A public nuisance is an unreasonable interference with a right common to the general public * * *.”
• public nuisance is unreasonable interference with health, safety, peace, comfort or convenience of general community
• finding no implied private remedy for enforcement of wetlands act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).