Citizens for Clean Government v. City of San Diego

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that limits on contributions to can- didates and ballot measure committees are subject to the same level of scrutiny
• applying this level of scrutiny to a contribution limit imposed during the signature phase of a recall effort
• finding a reasonable expectation because the plaintiffs would “be subject to the same contribution limits”
• finding a reasonable expectation because the plaintiffs would “be subject to the same contribution limits”
• denying motion to dismiss plaintiff’s First Amendment challenge to 24 regulation of vehicle horns where the record contained little evidence of the state’s 25 justification for the regulation
• remanding for further evidentiary development because the district court's finding that City's ordinance furthered a sufficient government interest \rested on hypothetical situations not derived from any record evidence or government findings\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).