Skip to main content
· 1/31/1984

Citizens Bank, Vienna v. Bowen

Citations

  • 315 S.E.2d 437
  • 169 Ga. App. 896
  • 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 1751

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • determining that the plaintiff was not prevented from reading the documents he signed even though he alleged that the document was covered up so that he could not see all of its terms
  • determining that the plaintiff was not prevented from reading the documents he signed even though he alleged that the document was covered up so that he could not see all of its terms
  • the fact that one party was in a “hurry” to have the agreements signed does not mean the other party was prevented from reading it
  • the fact that one party was in a “hurry” to have the agreements signed does not mean the other party was prevented from reading it
  • evidence that defendants covered part of document and were in a hurry to have documents signed insufficient to establish that plaintiff was prevented by fraud from reading documents
  • evidence that defendants covered part of document and were in a hurry to have documents signed insufficient to establish that plaintiff was prevented by fraud from reading documents

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sognier, Quillian, Pope

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.