· 1/31/1984
Citizens Bank, Vienna v. Bowen
Citations
- 315 S.E.2d 437
- 169 Ga. App. 896
- 1984 Ga. App. LEXIS 1751
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- determining that the plaintiff was not prevented from reading the documents he signed even though he alleged that the document was covered up so that he could not see all of its terms
- determining that the plaintiff was not prevented from reading the documents he signed even though he alleged that the document was covered up so that he could not see all of its terms
- the fact that one party was in a “hurry” to have the agreements signed does not mean the other party was prevented from reading it
- the fact that one party was in a “hurry” to have the agreements signed does not mean the other party was prevented from reading it
- evidence that defendants covered part of document and were in a hurry to have documents signed insufficient to establish that plaintiff was prevented by fraud from reading documents
- evidence that defendants covered part of document and were in a hurry to have documents signed insufficient to establish that plaintiff was prevented by fraud from reading documents
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sognier, Quillian, Pope
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.