Citizens Awareness Network, Inc. v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a party had waived claims in light of the “sparsity of its allegations and the complete lack of argument or factual support”
• concluding that a party had waived claims in light of the “sparsity of its allegations and the complete lack of argument or factual support”
• observing that deference is especially marked in technical or scientific matters within the agency area of expertise
• observing that deference is especially marked in technical or scientific matters within the agency area of expertise
• noting that review under the APA is narrow and that \agency decisions will be upheld so long as they do not collide directly with substantive statutory commands\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• remanding to agency because agency altered interpretation of regulation without providing reasoning or following statutory procedures

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).