CitiSteel USA, Inc. v. CONNELL LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that parties’ intent that payment constitute total satisfaction of debt or claim is element of accord and satisfaction
• noting that parties’ intent that payment constitute total satisfaction of debt or claim is element of accord and satisfaction
• discussing that unequivocal repudiation of contract relieves other contracting party from performance obligations
• “Committing to revoke coverage would alone, if wrongful, constitute anticipatory breach of the insurance contract.”
• citingAciernov. Worthy Bros. Pipeline Corp., 693 A.2d 1066, 1068 (Del. 1997)
• noting “[t]he question of whether Luria's September 21, 1989 letter constituted a repudiation precluding it from later declaring a default against CitiSteel was properly submitted to the jury” when the alleged repudiation letter could be interpreted in either of two ways

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).