Citimortgage, Inc. v. Onua

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that counsel’s computer problems did not constitute excusable neglect where counsel failed to actively monitor the court’s docket or find some other .means by which to stay informed of docket activity
• explaining that although the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure have been subsequently amended, “CODESCO remains binding precedent”
• explaining that a party moving for relief under Rule 60(b) “must demonstrate at least one of the six grounds for relief listed in Rule 60(b)”
• reiterating that a motion filed in the time allowed for seeking Rule 59(e) relief should be analyzed under that Rule, rather than Rule 60(b)
• explaining that a party moving for relief under Rule 60(b) “must demonstrate at least one of the six grounds for relief listed in Rule 60(b)”
• stating that “the failure of a party to respond to a summary judgment motion may leave uncontroverted those facts established by the motion”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).