Citimortgage, Inc. v. Martinez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding plaintiff’s subsequent claims did not pass the scope test in part because “each claim was supported by distinct factual allegations”
• noting that “[without the predicate filing in MCAD, the Su perior Court has no jurisdiction to entertain the claim of discrimination” as the MCAD filing cannot be waived
• vacating judgment after jury trial and ordering dismissal because Superior Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction
• “Because DOT had exclusive authority over the qualification issue ... the judge was required to refer the issue to the agency”
• \It is [appellant's] obligation to include in the record appendix any document on which he relies\
• “without the predicate filing in MCAD, the Superior Court has no jurisdiction to entertain the claim of discrimination”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).