Skip to main content
· 7/3/2003

Citigroup, Inc. v. Pacific Investment Management Co. (In Re Enron Corp.)

Citations

  • 296 B.R. 505
  • 50 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 769
  • 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11703
  • 2003 WL 21637908

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Bankruptcy courts have broad discretion to remand cases over which they 17 otherwise have jurisdiction on any equitable ground.”
  • identifies 14 factors considered in deciding remand motion, 12 of which are the factors identified in In re Tucson Estates, Inc., 912 F.2d 1162, 1167 (9th Cir. 1990), as relevant to deciding discretionary abstention motions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Taylor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.