Skip to main content
· 7/1/2011

CITIFINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. v. Holland

Citations

  • 713 S.E.2d 678
  • 310 Ga. App. 480
  • 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 2217
  • 2011 Ga. App. LEXIS 576

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that we lacked jurisdiction over direct appeal from trial court order that did not resolve attorney fee motion
  • concluding that we lacked jurisdiction over direct appeal from trial court order that did not resolve attorney fee motion
  • concluding that appellant’s failure to comply with the requisite interlocutory appeal procedures deprived the court of jurisdiction, mandating dismissal of direct appeal
  • dismissing appeal for failure to comply with interlocutory appeal procedure when trial court did not rule on plaintiff’s “claim for attorney fees and costs”
  • trial court order that left claim for attorney fees pending was not a final judgment
  • an order is considered a final judgment within the meaning of OCGA § 5-6-34 (a) (1) where it leaves no issues to be resolved, constitutes the court’s final ruling on the merits of the action, and leaves the parties with no further recourse in the trial court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mikell, Smith, Dillard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.