Skip to main content
· 3/10/1995

Citicorp Mortgage, Inc. v. Brooks (In Re Ex-Cel Concrete Co.)

Citations

  • 178 B.R. 198
  • 33 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 169
  • 95 Daily Journal DAR 4026
  • 1995 Bankr. LEXIS 348
  • 26 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1081
  • 1995 WL 126299

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that because notice to Citicorp was defective, the court lacked personal jurisdiction over Citicorp and therefore could not authorize a sale free and clear of Citicorp’s lien
  • voiding sale free and clear of lien-holder’s lien because “lack of any notice to [lienholder] constituted constitutional lack of due process which could not confer in personam jurisdiction on the bankruptcy court to adjudicate [lienholder’s] property rights”
  • “lack of any notice ... was a jurisdictional defect sufficient to result in a void order”
  • discussing notice requirements of due process and § 363(b)(1)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Volinn, Yolinn, Ashland, MacDonald

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.