Citibank (S.D.), N.A. v. Savage (In Re Savage)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the pro se defendant’s failure to respond to requests for admissions did not prejudice the plaintiffs, his mistake was not “frivolous, but rather the uniformed omission of a pro se defendant,” and thus the unanswered requests were not deemed as admitted
• “Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 36 was not intended to be used as a technical weapon to defeat the rights of pro se litigants to have their cases fairly judged on the merits.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).