Citibank, N.A. v. Swiatkoski

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court has authority to remand sua sponte and without notice when it is clear that the court lacks subject-matter jurisdiction
• explaining that state court’s alleged violation of party’s constitutional due process rights in foreclosure proceeding could not be basis for removal
• rejecting defendant’s petition for removal under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, where defendant was the state-court loser
• providing pro se parties with notice that filing future lawsuits or notices of removal related to state court foreclosure proceedings could result in filing ban
• no subject matter jurisdiction over removed foreclosure action where removing defendant contended that her constitutional and federal civil rights had been violated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).