Citibank, N.A. v. Konigsberg

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The issue of whether record activity has occurred within the meaning of rule 1.420(e) is subject to de novo review because it involves the construction of a procedural issue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Zuppardo v. Dunlap and Moran, P.A.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-02-12· cited 5×
• Robinson v. Marek
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-08-24· cited 2×
• JAMES L. TATE, JR. v. WALTER A. MC NEIL, SECRETARY
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-04-10· cited 1×
• MOTE WELLNESS & REHAB, INC. A/A/O FRED BIRKENFELD v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2021-11-24
• Peter R. Ehrlich, Jr. v. Timothy M. Hogle
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-07-31
• Westwind Leasing Corp., Etc. v. J v. Air Maintenance, Inc., Etc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2026-06-17

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Wilson v. Salamon
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2005-10-20· cited 57×
• Chemrock Corp. v. Tampa Electric Co.
  Supreme Court of Florida· 2011-06-30· cited 38×
• Weston Tc Lllp v. Cndp Marketing Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-07-27· cited 15×
• Norman v. Darville
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-09-19· cited 5×