Skip to main content
· 3/4/1985

Citibank, N.A. And Citicorp v. Citytrust and Citytrust Bancorp, Inc.

Citations

  • 756 F.2d 273
  • 225 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 708
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 29738

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that \significant delay in applying for injunctive relief ... alone may justify denial\ of preliminary relief
  • concluding that “significant delay” in applying for preliminary injunctive “may justify denial of a preliminary injunction for trademark infringement”
  • holding that “significant delay in applying for injunctive relief . . . alone may justify denial” of preliminary relief
  • holding that a delay in seeking a preliminary injunction “tends to neutralize any presumption that infringement alone will cause irreparable harm pending trial”
  • holding that a party’s “failure to act sooner undercuts the sense of urgency that ordinarily accompanies a motion for preliminary relief and suggests that there is, in fact, no irreparable injury” (internal quotation marks omitted)
  • finding that even a ten week delay from discovery of alleged copyright infringement to commencement of the lawsuit destroyed any presumption of irreparable harm

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mansfield, Pratt, Peck

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.