Skip to main content
· 12/12/2002

Citgo Refining and Marketing, Inc. v. Garza

Citations

  • 94 S.W.3d 322
  • 2002 Tex. App. LEXIS 8806
  • 2002 WL 31769504

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[A]n order that merely alters attributes of a class and does not affect the 13 underlying certification of the action as a class action is not an order subject to interlocutory appeal under article 51.014(a)(3).”
  • “[The Texas Supreme Court] did not hold . . . that a conflict of interest alone, even if one is created, transforms an order that is not otherwise subject to interlocutory appeal into one that is.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hinojosa, Castillo, Chavez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.