Skip to main content
· 3/25/2004

Cistola v. Daniel

Citations

  • 598 S.E.2d 535
  • 266 Ga. App. 891

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • fraud claimant “could not be held to the same level of diligence required of a purchasing or selling party in a standard real estate transaction”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Adams, Andrews, Barnes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.