Skip to main content
· 12/11/1916

Cissna v. Tennessee

Citations

  • 242 U.S. 195
  • 37 S. Ct. 108
  • 61 L. Ed. 243
  • 1916 U.S. LEXIS 1511

Syllabus

<p>The jurisdiction of this court being here challenged; and it appearing that the facts presented are identical with those on which depends a suit over boundary, brought by the State of Arkansas against the State of Tennessee (defendant in error herein) while this case was pending in the courts of the latter State; that a decision of this case upon the merits will be equivalent to a decision of the boundary controversy and that an affirmance of the judgment will dispose of the avails of nearly or quite all the lands involved in that case and . this; Ordered, that this case be restored to the docket and be assigned for hearing immediately after the boundary case; and that upon a stipulation of the facts of that case by the parties thereto, both cases will be taken on briefs if all parties consent, or advanced for early argument if they prefer.</p>

Judges: White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.