Circuit City Stores, Inc. A Virginia Corporation v. Saint Clair Adams, a California Resident

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an arbitration fee allocating scheme in an employment contract would, alone, render the arbitration provision unconscionable under California law
• holding that an arbitration fee allocating scheme in an employment contract would, alone, render the arbitration provision unconscionable under California law
• holding that plaintiff employees should not “have to pay either unreasonable costs or any arbitrators’ fees or expenses as a condition of access to the arbitration forum”
• concluding that, under California law, whether or not a contract is one of adhesion goes to whether or not it is procedurally unconscionable
• holding that plaintiff employees should not <•h11Ye to pay either unreasonable costs ox any arbitratots' fees ot expenses as i\\ 8 79 condition of access to the arbitration fonun'
• holding unconscionable similar arbitration agreement that required employees to submit all claims and disputes to binding arbitration

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).