· 12/9/1993
Circle K Corp. v. Industrial Commission
Citations
- 880 P.2d 642
- 179 Ariz. 422
- 153 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 20
- 1993 Ariz. App. LEXIS 272
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that issue preclusion did not apply because an element of plaintiffs claim was not litigated in a prior lawsuit
- endorsing “the use of the descriptive terms ‘claim preclusion’ and ‘issue preclusion’ instead of the archaic phrases ‘res judicata’ and ‘collateral estoppel.’”
- “Issue preclusion requires actual litigation. Claim preclusion does not.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Foreman, Gerber, Grant
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.