Skip to main content
· 12/9/1993

Circle K Corp. v. Industrial Commission

Citations

  • 880 P.2d 642
  • 179 Ariz. 422
  • 153 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 20
  • 1993 Ariz. App. LEXIS 272

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that issue preclusion did not apply because an element of plaintiffs claim was not litigated in a prior lawsuit
  • endorsing “the use of the descriptive terms ‘claim preclusion’ and ‘issue preclusion’ instead of the archaic phrases ‘res judicata’ and ‘collateral estoppel.’”
  • “Issue preclusion requires actual litigation. Claim preclusion does not.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Foreman, Gerber, Grant

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.