Ciprotti v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The entry of an order of nolle prosequi in a case does not prevent a defendant as a matter of law from claiming the benefits of [the speedy trial statute].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ciprotti v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1989-03-08· cited 13×
• Knight v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1990-09-04· cited 7×
• Day v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1994-12-14· cited 7×
• State v. Daniels
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1992-11-10· cited 6×
• Davis v. Wilson
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2005-11-21· cited 4×
• Maurice Carter v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2017-09-15
• Robert David Jordan v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2024-04-22
• Steven McCalla v. Commonwealth of Virginia
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2026-05-12

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hubbard v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1985-09-04· cited 82×
• Smith v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1988-03-11· cited 26×
• Ould v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1988-02-24· cited 18×
• Coker v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1987-01-21· cited 7×
• Cook v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1987-06-30· cited 4×