Cione v. Gorr

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the phrase “[we] anticipate continued strong demand for tire products” does not contain the “type of event specific information” necessary to render the statement material
• citing, Platsis v. E.F. Hutton & Co., 946 F.2d 38, 40 (6th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 503 U.S. 984, 112 S.Ct. 1669, 118 L.Ed.2d 389 (1992)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).