Skip to main content
· 3/13/2007

Cintron v. McDonough

Citations

  • 950 So. 2d 514
  • 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 3688
  • 2007 WL 737554

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting explicit textual differences in Home Improvement Act in concluding that Common Interest Ownership Act; General Statutes § 47-200 et seq.; does not provide unrestricted right of rescission as remedy for violation
  • “Any latent ambiguity in the statutory language itself is normally resolved by turning for guidance to the legislative history and the purpose the statute is to serve.”
  • outlining five major parts of the act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis, Hawkes, Padovano

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.