Cinkus v. Village of Stickney Municipal Officers Electoral Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that where statutory language is clear, there is no need for other tools of construction
• noting that an argument or issue not presented in an administrative hearing is defaulted
• detailing standard of review for reviewing an electoral board’s factual findings and decisions involving mixed questions of fact and law
• reviewing an election board’s finding that a candidate was indebted to the village and was not entitled to run for a village trustee office
• reviewing an election board's finding that a candidate was indebted to the village and was not entitled to run for a village trustee office
• noting that the supreme court has advised that a party in an administrative proceeding should assert a constitutional challenge on the record despite the fact that “an administrative agency lacks the authority to declare a statute unconstitutional, or even to question its validity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).