Cinergy Corp. v. Associated Electric & Gas Insurance Services, Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the interpretation of a written contract is a question of law, which is “appropriate for summary judgment”
• determining an excess liability insurer was not required to pay defense costs under a policy’s terms because claims against insured power companies under the Clean Air Act did not flow from an “occurrence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).