Cindy Ludwig v. Dakota County, Self-Insured by SFM Risk Solutions, Relator

Syllabus

1. The Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals did not make an impermissible factual finding when it applied the special-errand exception because the finding and its supporting inference were not manifestly contrary to the evidence. 2. The Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals did not err as a matter of law by concluding that the employee's injury was compensable under the special-errand exception to the general rule that an employee's injury that occurs while commuting to and from work is not compensable. Affirmed.