Cindy D. Prebilich-Holland v. Gaylord Entertainment Company, D/B/A Wsm Radio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff lacked evidence to support an inference that a decisionmaker knew of her pregnancy, in part because coworkers with knowledge of the plaintiff’s pregnancy did not share that information with anyone in the office
• holding that temporal proximity satisfies the nexus requirement
• finding that close proximity creates no inference of causation when the termination procedure was instituted several days before knowledge of protected status or activity
• finding that close proximity creates no inference of causation when the termination procedure was instituted several days before knowledge of protected status or activity
• stating that to establish the protected characteristic was a motivating factor in the challenged decision, the employee must show the decision-maker had “actual knowledge” of the protected characteristic
• stating that to establish the protected characteristic was a motivating factor in the challenged decision, the employee must show the decision-maker had “actual knowledge” of the protected characteristic

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).