Cindrich v. Robinhill Development

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in contract action, injured party’s loss may be computed by any “rational methods upon a firm basis of facts”
• The profits “must be capable of ascertainment by reference to some definite standard, either of market value, established experience, or direct inference from known circumstances.”
• “[t]he long-established general mie for breach of contract recovery in Massachusetts is that the wronged party should receive the benefit of his bargain, i.e., be placed in the same position as if the contract had been performed”
• “A comparatively insignificant incident may be in such combination with others as to lead to a conclusion in one decision apparently at variance with that reached in others. Each case must be decided on its own facts under this necessarily somewhat broad and comprehensive proposition.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).