Cincinnati Traction Co. v. Durack
Citations
- 78 Ohio St. (N.S.) 243
Syllabus
<p>Motion for verdict at close of plaintiff’s evidence overruled — Exception waived by introduction of evidence, vahen.</p> <p>Where on the trial of a civil action, the defendant, at the close of plaintiff’s evidence, moves for a verdict thereon in his favor, and on excepting to the decision of the court overruling said motion, introduces evidence to support his grounds of defense, and rests without renewing the motion at the close of all the evidence, the exception is deemed to be waived, and it is no longer a predicate for error in a reviewing court.</p>
Judges: Crew, Davis, Iauck, Price, Spear, Summers
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Columbia & Puget Sound Railroad v. HawthorneSupreme Court· 1892-04-04· cited 207×
- Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. CummingsSupreme Court· 1883-01-18· cited 170×
- Union Pacific Railway Co. v. DanielsSupreme Court· 1894-04-16· cited 138×
- Bogk v. GassertSupreme Court· 1893-04-17· cited 97×
- Union Insurance v. SmithSupreme Court· 1888-01-30· cited 82×
- Joliet, Aurora & Northern Railway Co. v. VelieIllinois Supreme Court· 1892-01-18· cited 41×
- Robertson v. PerkinsSupreme Court· 1889-01-28· cited 40×
- Core v. Ohio River R'dWest Virginia Supreme Court· 1893-12-06· cited 27×
- Wilson v. Haley Live Stock Co.Supreme Court· 1894-04-16· cited 18×
- Lynch v. JohnsonMichigan Supreme Court· 1896-06-30· cited 8×
Other cases named Cincinnati Traction Co. v. Durack
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.