Cincinnati SMSA Ltd. Partnership v. Cincinnati Bell Cellular Systems Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the implied covenant should be applied in “rare and fact-intensive [cases], turning on issues of compelling fairness”
• noting that use of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing should be “rare and fact-intensive, turning on issues of compelling fairness”
• explaining that application of the implied covenant “should be rare and fact-intensive, turning on issues of compelling fairness”
• explaining that application of the implied covenant “should be rare and fact-intensive, turning on issues of compelling fairness”
• noting that use of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing should be “rare and fact-intensive, turning on issues of compelling fairness”
• explaining that application of the implied covenant “should be rare and fact-intensive, turning on issues of compelling fairness”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).