Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Ry. Co. v. Troxell

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting summary judgment in favor of the plan entity on the plaintiff’s section 1132(a)(1)(B) claim because the insurer “was the sole entity responsible for denying [the] plaintiff’s claim”
• granting summary judgment in favor of the plan entity on the plaintiff’s section 1132(a)(1)(B) claim because the insurer “was the sole entity responsible for denying [the] plaintiff’s claim”
• finding breach of fiduciary duty where ERISA plan administrator failed to provide clear and complete information about continuation of life insurance coverage despite participant’s inquiry and known terminal illness, resulting in lapse of coverage and denial of benefits
• claim under section 1132(a)(3) is not foreclosed by claim under 1132(a)(1)(B), though relief sought was similar
• claim under section 502(a)(3) is not foreclosed by claim under 502(a)(1)(B), though relief sought was similar
• \The mere fact that the amount that plaintiff seeks under her (a)(3) claim is similar to the amount plaintiff seeks under her (a)(1)(B) claim does not automatically preclude her (a)(3) claim.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).