Skip to main content
· 1/14/1915

Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. Veatch

Citations

  • 162 Ky. 136
  • 172 S.W. 89
  • 1915 Ky. LEXIS 16

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming the ALJ’s decision to discount the plaintiffs subjective complaints based on substantial evidence to the contrary
  • affirming the ALJ’s decision to discount the plaintiff’ subjective complaints based on substantial evidence to the contrary
  • affirming the ALJ’s decision to discredit the plaintiffs subjective complaints where substantial evidence supported the ALJ’s finding
  • affirming the ALJ’s reliance on a consultative examiner’s findings that “plaintiff was ‘moderately limited’ in sitting, standing, walking, and carrying” in finding that Plaintiff could perform light work

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hannah

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.