Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. Goldston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “a defendant’s choice of forum deserves some weight where the harm from a federal agency’s decision is felt most directly in the transferee district” as part of the balancing analysis where the appropriateness of venue in the transferee forum was undisputed
• finding these private interest factors typically have little bearing in APA cases
• “Ultimately, the localized interest of Alabama's citizens in having this controversy decided in Alabama tips the scales in favor of transfer.”
• “Absent a showing that the docket of either court is ‘substantially more congested’ than the other, this factor is neutral.”
• “Absent a showing that the docket of either court is ‘substantially more congested’ than the other, this factor is neutral.”
• “The importance of respecting localized interests is equally applicable ‘to the judicial review 14 of an administrative decision which will be limited to the administrative record.’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).