Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railroad v. Hughett

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting equal protection challenge to AEDPA S 440(d) because of the distinction made between deportable and excludable aliens
• \The consequences of petitioner's criminal conduct were clear at the time of that conduct and they remain unchanged today.\ (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• “Once a facially legitimate reason for the classification is. found, whether such a reason was articulated by Congress or not, we must rule the classification constitutional.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).