Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific R. R. v. Carson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the Ex Parte Young 5 “exception applies only where a suit is maintained against a state official”
• stating that plaintiff’s “causes of action for monetary, injunctive, 14 and declaratory relief are each constitutional claims that can only be brought via 42 15 U.S.C. § 1983”
• stating that plaintiff’s 6 “causes of action for monetary, injunctive, and declaratory relief are each constitutional 7 claims that can only be brought via 42 U.S.C. § 1983”
• finding 2 plaintiff’s constitutional claims against the State of Washington, seeking monetary, 3 injunctive, and declaratory relief, barred as a matter of law for this same reason

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).